The recent strong growth in the housing market, coupled with
record-low interest rates, has raised fears about a real estate price
bubble. House prices are at their highest in three years. Mortgage lending is picking up. There has been increased demand from investors!!
Last week, the Reserve Bank hosed down fears of a housing price bubble
as "unrealistically alarmist", with its assistant governor Malcolm Edey
saying prices were rising in line with incomes over the past decade.
But what constitutes a housing bubble? How do we know if we are
approaching one, or already in one? Can a bubble only be identified in
hindsight?
Previous housing price bubbles ... housing prices in Ireland prices more than tripled, while in the US, they rose by 70 per cent. |
There's no definitive checklist, but here is a list of
factors analysts say are central to determining whether a bubble is
forming.
1. Property prices
Australia's housing market ... growing in popularity as an investment vehicle |
A sharp rise in housing prices is one of the first indicators.
Figures show that the capital city house prices rose 4 per cent in the
three months to August, the largest growth since April 2010.
The forecasts for housing price growth is more bullish.
For
Sydney, home prices are projected to soar by 15 to 20 per cent next
year, and that's after growth of 9 to 12 per cent this year, data firm
SQM Research said last week.
As a comparison, the European Central Bank estimated at between 1995 to 2005, homes prices in Ireland more than tripled
while in the US they soared by 70 per cent. The prices then sank by
more than 30 per cent when the financial crisis hit. With the benefit of
hindsight, such steep price rises can be see as signs of a bubble about
to bust.
House prices in Australia are considered to be expensive,
experts agree. In a housing bubble, they also have to be seen as
unsustainable.
At this stage, analysts say Australia's above-average
population growth, an actual excess of demand over supply - and only a
gradual lift in construction, coupled with low vacancy rates and rising
rents, are legitimate factors feeding the strong rises.
2. Credit growth
Strong credit growth has been cited as a key factor in
fuelling a housing bubble that would eventually burst. It can be driven
by low interest rates and loose lending standards, which could then lead
to mortgage borrowers being over leveraged.
Higher debt = higher leverage = sudden change in the wider economy such as a rise in unemployment could see these
mortgage holders struggle to repay their debt = higher risk
Australia's cash rate is at 2.5 per cent in attempt to boost economy by growing the housing market as the economy
rebalances away from mining-led growth.- a 60-year-low.
Credit
growth has lifted off its historic lows from earlier this year, but
remain very soft relative to previous years. Housing credit growth lifted by 4.7 per cent in the 12 months
to August. Part of the reason why credit growth is growing at a slower
pace is that about half of households, according to anecdotal evidence,
are not reducing their regular mortgage payments as interest rates
fallen, the RBA said.
However, this slow growth should be viewed together with
Australia's high household debt-to-income ratio, which the RBA has
warned about. It is at 147.3 per cent, lower than the record-level of
153 per cent which it reached before the financial crisis, according to
data from the central bank.
3. Lending standards
Closely linked to a strong rise in credit growth are banks'
lending standards. As we noted earlier, the availability of easy credit
to US homebuyers who usually wouldn't be granted loans fuelled a housing
boom that was ultimately unsustainable.
Looser lending standards are also expected to spark strong
growth in the volume and turnover of property, meaning that more people
are buying and selling homes to make a profit. Volume growth remains light in Australia.
Housing turnover has lifted from low levels, the RBA noted in
its September board meeting minutes. But they remain relatively low
compared to the previous decade.
However, the modest growth in credit poses a difficulty for
mortgage lenders, and could entice them to loosen lending standards to
draw in more clients. RBA warns to "maintain prudent risk appetite and lending practices, especially in
the current low interest rate environment".
4. Speculation
One sector of the housing market that has attracted the
attention of the RBA is the growth in the number of investor-owners. The
RBA has warned such investors not to expect the same strong growth in
house prices that Australia experienced in the 1990s and early 2000s.
The analysts warned that Australian banks have more investment property in New Zealand and the UK - 32 per cent compared to 20 per cent and 12 per cent respectively.
The analysts warned that Australian banks have more investment property in New Zealand and the UK - 32 per cent compared to 20 per cent and 12 per cent respectively.
"significant growth in negatively geared investment property over the
last 20 years should be of concern"
Australia's large exposure to a very highly
leveraged landlord population is a significant systemic risk. ... We do
not believe that these implications have been fully considered by the
banks, regulators or market participants.
The RBA has also been keeping a close eye on the self-managed
superannuation fund (SMSF) sector, which it warned "represents a
vehicle for potentially speculative demand for property that did not
exist in the past".
The sector has increased its property holdings, after
legislative changes allowed super funds including SMSFs to borrow to
invest in assets such as property.
Further reading:
- European Central Bank: Asset price bubbles: how they build up and how to prevent them?
- RBA: How should central banks respond to asset-price bubbles?
No comments:
Post a Comment